Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)



Countries By Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)



Key points



Official Definition of Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)

Taxes on goods and services include general sales and turnover or value added taxes, selective excises on goods, selective taxes on services, taxes on the use of goods or property, taxes on extraction and production of minerals, and profits of fiscal monopolies.



Importance

**Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)**

Taxes on goods and services include general sales and turnover or value added taxes, selective excises on goods, selective taxes on services, taxes on the use of goods or property, taxes on extraction and production of minerals, and profits of fiscal monopolies.


The percentage of revenue derived from taxes on goods and services is a crucial macroeconomic indicator for a country. A low value of this statistic may indicate an inefficient tax collection system, potential tax evasion, or a limited tax base. This could lead to budget deficits, inadequate funding for public services, and hindered economic growth.

Conversely, a high value of taxes on goods and services (% of revenue) could suggest a robust tax collection system, a broad tax base, and effective fiscal policy. This can lead to sufficient government revenue to finance public services, infrastructure development, social programs, and investments in education and healthcare. Additionally, a higher tax revenue may contribute to economic stability and sustainable development.



Top 10 Countries by Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)

Bottom 10 Countries by Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)



Regions

Europe

Among the listed countries, Moldova has the highest taxation on goods and services at 47.42% of revenue, indicating a significant reliance on this type of taxation. Countries like Croatia, Bulgaria, and Albania also have relatively high rates, while Germany, France, and the UK show lower percentages. High taxation can provide a stable revenue source for public services but may burden consumers and businesses. Lower rates can attract investment but might limit government revenue. This statistic's impact extends to government budgets, economic competitiveness, and social welfare programs, reflecting each country's fiscal policies and economic priorities.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Australia, South Korea, and Malaysia have relatively lower taxes on goods and services, indicating a potentially more business-friendly environment. Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand, and China have higher percentages, suggesting a heavier tax burden on consumption. Singapore stands out with a moderate rate. Higher taxes may provide governments with more revenue for public services but could also deter consumer spending. Lower taxes, on the other hand, may attract investment but could lead to challenges in funding government projects. This statistic can impact economic development by influencing consumer behavior, government revenue, and overall competitiveness in the global market.

ASEAN

Cambodia has the highest taxes on goods and services (% of revenue) among the selected countries, indicating a significant reliance on indirect taxation. Indonesia follows with a lower but still substantial percentage, reflecting a similar dependence on this form of revenue. Thailand and Malaysia also have relatively high percentages, suggesting a significant contribution of taxes on goods and services to their overall revenue. The Philippines and Singapore have intermediate levels of taxation in this category. High taxes on goods and services can lead to potential disadvantages such as increased cost of living and reduced consumer spending, but they can also provide stable revenue for government expenditures and infrastructure development, which can benefit economic growth.

Latin America

Among the listed countries, Guatemala has the highest Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue) at 53.04%, while Chile follows closely behind at 49.18%. These high tax rates may indicate strong government reliance on revenue from goods and services. On the other hand, Brazil has a relatively lower tax rate at 18.94%, potentially signaling a more lenient tax policy. High taxes can provide stable revenue for government programs but may also burden businesses and consumers, potentially slowing economic growth. Lower tax rates can attract investment but may limit government resources for public services. Each country's tax policy can significantly impact its development trajectory and economic competitiveness in the global market.

Middle East

Armenia, Georgia, and Jordan stand out with high taxes on goods and services, indicating a heavy reliance on consumption-related revenue. In contrast, the United Arab Emirates has a notably low percentage, aligning with its tax-friendly environment to attract businesses. Azerbaijan and Lebanon fall in the middle range, reflecting moderate reliance on such taxes. Higher taxes can potentially discourage consumer spending and investments, affecting economic growth negatively. On the other hand, they provide stable revenue sources for government spending on infrastructure and social welfare programs. Lower taxes can attract foreign investment but might lead to budget deficits if not balanced properly.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

When analyzing the Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue) statistic for the selected countries, we can observe significant variations. The United States stands out with the lowest percentage at 2.29%, indicating a reliance on other sources of revenue. In contrast, China leads with 34.39%, showing a heavier burden on goods and services. High percentages in South Africa and the United Kingdom also suggest a significant dependence on this form of taxation. While high tax rates can boost government revenue for development, they may also deter investment and consumer spending. In contrast, lower rates can attract business but may limit the state's capacity for funding essential services.

Russia v Ukraine

Both the Russian Federation and Ukraine exhibit varying levels of reliance on taxes on goods and services as a percentage of their total revenue. Ukraine has a higher percentage at 40.10%, indicating a greater dependency on these types of taxes compared to the Russian Federation at 23.66%. Ukraine's higher tax rate may provide a more stable revenue source; however, it could also potentially burden consumers and businesses. In contrast, the Russian Federation's lower tax rate may attract investment and spur economic growth but could lead to revenue shortfalls. The effective management of this statistic is crucial for both countries' development, impacting government finances, economic stability, and public perception of taxation policies.

France v United Kingdom

France has a Taxes on goods and services percentage of revenue of 23.19%, while the United Kingdom stands higher at 33.08%. The United Kingdom's higher tax rate indicates a greater reliance on taxes from goods and services for revenue compared to France. This suggests that the United Kingdom may have a more consumption-driven economy or a higher level of government spending. Higher taxes in the UK could potentially hinder consumer spending and business investments, limiting economic growth. On the other hand, France's lower tax rate may signal a more balanced revenue mix and potentially less burden on businesses and consumers, possibly supporting economic activities. Ultimately, the impact of this statistic on each country's development will depend on how effectively the generated revenue is utilized to drive growth and address socio-economic challenges.

Turkey v Greece

In terms of taxes on goods and services, Greece levies approximately 31.48% of its revenue from this source, while Turkey derives a higher percentage of around 37.27%. Greece's lower tax percentage suggests a slightly more diversified revenue stream compared to Turkey, which relies more heavily on these taxes. For Greece, this lower reliance could indicate a potentially less stable revenue base but also may make its economy less vulnerable to fluctuations in consumer spending. Turkey's higher reliance on these taxes could signify a greater vulnerability to changes in consumer behavior but may also indicate a more significant contribution from the consumption sector to its overall revenue. Overall, the impact of this statistic on both countries speaks to their fiscal policies, economic structures, and resilience against economic shocks.



FAQs