Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)



Countries By Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)



Key points



Official Definition of Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)

Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.



Importance

The Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%) is a crucial macroeconomic statistic that holds significant implications for a country's economic development and international trade relationships.

In conclusion, the value of the applied tariff rate for manufactured products is a critical indicator of a country's trade stance and can significantly impact its economic performance and competitiveness in the global market.



Top 10 Countries by Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)

Bottom 10 Countries by Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)



Regions

Europe

The data on tariff rates applied to manufactured products shows varying levels among the listed countries. Norway has the lowest rate at 0.34%, while Belarus and the Russian Federation have higher rates at 5.13% and 4.95% respectively. The majority of countries, including Austria, Belgium, and Poland, have a rate of 1.6%. Lower rates like those of Norway and Switzerland can attract foreign investment and promote competitiveness. However, higher rates may protect domestic industries but could lead to higher consumer prices and decreased international trade. These tariff rates can impact the economic development of each country by influencing trade dynamics, industrial growth, and overall competitiveness in the global market.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Among the listed countries, Brunei has the lowest applied tariff rate for manufactured products at 0.17%, offering a competitive advantage for international trade. Japan and Australia follow with relatively low rates of 1.13% and 2.09% respectively, enhancing their attractiveness for foreign investments. Conversely, Cambodia and Indonesia have higher tariffs of 8.05% and 6.32% respectively, which may hinder their competitiveness in the global market. This statistic indicates favorable conditions for Brunei and Japan in terms of trade partnerships and economic growth potential, while countries like Cambodia and Indonesia may face challenges in attracting foreign investments and expanding their manufacturing sectors.

ASEAN

Brunei has the lowest applied tariff rate on manufactured products at 0.17%, indicating a very open trade policy. Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam have higher rates ranging from 5.31% to 8.05%, reflecting a moderate level of protectionism. Laos and the Philippines fall in between with rates of 2.75% and 3.25% respectively. Brunei's low tariff rate can attract foreign investment and promote economic growth but may also make domestic industries vulnerable. Meanwhile, higher tariff rates in Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam protect domestic industries but could hinder international trade and foreign investment. Finding the right balance in tariff rates is crucial for these countries to foster economic development and ensure competitiveness in the global market.

Latin America

Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Uruguay, and Venezuela stand out with higher applied tariff rates on manufactured products, ranging from 10.20% to 14.61%. In contrast, Chile and Peru have notably lower tariffs at 1.02% and 1.20% respectively. This variation can influence the competitiveness of domestic industries, with higher tariffs protecting local producers but potentially raising consumer prices. Countries with lower tariffs may attract more foreign investment due to reduced trade barriers, fostering economic growth but also exposing domestic industries to more competition. Each country must carefully balance the advantages of protecting domestic industries with the benefits of promoting trade and attracting foreign investment to ensure sustainable economic development.

Middle East

The Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, for manufactured products varies among the selected countries. Iran has the highest rate at 15.6%, indicating a relatively more closed economy, while Georgia has the lowest at 0.18%, showing a more open trade policy. Countries like Algeria and Syria have rates above 9%, suggesting higher barriers to trade. These tariff rates can impact each country's development differently. Higher tariffs can protect domestic industries but may lead to higher prices for consumers. Lower tariffs can attract foreign investment but may harm local producers. Each country must balance these advantages and disadvantages to drive economic growth effectively.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

When analyzing the applied tariff rates on manufactured products, it is evident that Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States have relatively low rates ranging from 1.47% to 2.92%, indicating a more open trade policy. On the other hand, Brazil, India, South Africa, and China have significantly higher rates, with Brazil at 14.11% and India at 8.18%. The Russian Federation falls in the middle at 4.95%. Lower tariffs can attract foreign investment and boost economic growth but may harm domestic industries. Higher tariffs protect domestic producers but can limit access to new technologies and international markets, hindering overall economic development for these countries.

Russia v Ukraine

Looking at the data for the Tariff Rate applied on manufactured products, we see that the Russian Federation has a tariff rate of 4.95% while Ukraine has a lower rate of 2.02%. The higher tariff rate in Russia may indicate a more protective trade policy for its manufacturing sector compared to Ukraine, which could potentially shield domestic industries but may also lead to higher prices for consumers due to limited competition. On the other hand, Ukraine's lower tariff rate suggests a more open approach to international trade, encouraging foreign investment and potentially fostering greater economic diversity. These differences in tariff rates could impact the development of each country by influencing the competitiveness of their manufactured goods in the global market and shaping their trade relations with other nations.

France v United Kingdom

France has a relatively low average applied tariff rate on manufactured products at 1.6%, indicating a more open trade policy. In comparison, the United Kingdom has a slightly higher tariff rate of 1.82%. France's lower tariff provides advantages such as cheaper imports, fostering international trade relationships, and potentially boosting consumer choices. However, it could also expose domestic industries to more competition. On the other hand, the United Kingdom's slightly higher tariff may offer protection to domestic industries but could lead to higher prices for consumers. This statistic demonstrates each country's approach to trade policy and can impact their economic development by influencing competitiveness, industry growth, and international trade dynamics.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran applies a simple mean tariff rate of 15.6% on manufactured products, while Saudi Arabia applies a rate of 4.68%. This indicates that Iran imposes a significantly higher tariff on manufactured goods compared to Saudi Arabia. Iran's higher tariff may protect its domestic industries but could also limit foreign investment and access to international markets, potentially hindering economic growth. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia's lower tariff may attract more foreign investment and promote trade, supporting economic diversification and growth. However, it may also expose domestic industries to greater competition. Overall, the tariff rate applied on manufactured products plays a crucial role in shaping each country's economic development trajectory and trade relations.

India v Pakistan

India and Pakistan have different applied tariff rates on manufactured products, with India at 8.18% and Pakistan at 12.04%. Pakistan imposes a higher tariff rate compared to India, which could potentially protect its domestic industries but may also limit access to foreign markets and slow down economic growth due to reduced trade. On the other hand, India's lower tariff rate could attract more foreign investment and foster greater international trade relationships, promoting economic development. However, it may also expose domestic industries to more competition, potentially affecting local businesses negatively. The applied tariff rates for manufactured products in both countries play a crucial role in shaping their trade dynamics, competitiveness, and overall economic progress.

Turkey v Greece

With Greece having a simple mean applied tariff rate of 1.6% for manufactured products, and Turkey at 1.38%, it is evident that both countries maintain relatively low tariff rates in this sector. Greece's slightly higher tariff rate may provide a small advantage in terms of protecting domestic manufacturing industries compared to Turkey. However, Turkey's lower tariff rate can attract more foreign investment and foster greater international trade opportunities. For Greece, the advantage lies in shielding domestic industries, but it may deter foreign investment. On the other hand, Turkey's lower rate can stimulate economic growth through increased trade but may leave its industries more exposed to global competition. Overall, this statistic suggests that both countries have strategically balanced their tariff rates to either protect domestic industries or promote international trade, reflecting differing priorities in economic development.

China v Japan

China, People's Republic of applies a simple mean tariff rate of 5.13% on manufactured products, while Japan applies a lower rate of 1.13%. China's higher tariff rate indicates a more protectionist approach to its domestic industry, aiming to shield local manufacturers from international competition. This can provide short-term advantages like safeguarding jobs but may lead to inefficiencies and higher prices for consumers. On the other hand, Japan's lower tariff rate promotes international trade and access to a wider variety of products, fostering competition and potential innovation. This can drive economic growth in the long run but may also expose domestic industries to intense global competition. The impact of this statistic on the countries' development is significant, influencing their trade dynamics, industrial competitiveness, and overall economic growth.



FAQs