Services, value added (annual % growth)
Countries By Services, value added (annual % growth)
Key points
- Eswatini has shown the highest positive annual % growth in Services, indicating potential economic growth and development in the country.
- Maldives has experienced the lowest annual % growth in Services, which may point towards economic challenges or structural issues within the service sector.
- The average annual % growth in Services across all countries is negative (-5.19%), suggesting a general trend of decline or slower growth in the service industry.
- Several countries, including Saint Lucia, Antigua and Barbuda, and Barbados, have experienced a significant decline in Services, potentially indicating economic vulnerabilities in these nations.
- Developed countries like the United States, United Kingdom, and France also show negative growth in Services, reflecting broader global economic uncertainties impacting the service sector.
Official Definition of Services, value added (annual % growth)
Annual growth rate for value added in services based on constant local currency. Aggregates are based on constant 2015 prices, expressed in U.S. dollars. Services correspond to ISIC divisions 45-99. They include value added in wholesale and retail trade (including hotels and restaurants), transport, and government, financial, professional, and personal services such as education, health care, and real estate services. Also included are imputed bank service charges, import duties, and any statistical discrepancies noted by national compilers as well as discrepancies arising from rescaling. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The industrial origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), revision 4.
Importance
Services, value added (annual % growth) is a crucial macroeconomic statistic for a country as it reflects the annual growth rate of value added in services sector based on constant local currency. This statistic is important because services sector plays a significant role in the economy, encompassing various industries such as wholesale and retail trade, transport, government, financial services, education, healthcare, and more.
When the value of Services, value added (annual % growth) is low, it can indicate stagnation or decline in the services sector, which may have several implications for the country:
- Reduced economic productivity and growth as the services sector is a major contributor to GDP
- Lack of diversification in the economy, making it more vulnerable to external shocks
- Potential unemployment or underemployment in service-related industries
On the other hand, when the value of Services, value added (annual % growth) is high, it signifies a robust and expanding services sector, leading to various positive outcomes:
- Increased economic growth and productivity driven by the services industry
- Greater job opportunities and income generation in service-oriented fields
- Enhanced competitiveness and innovation in service-related industries
In conclusion, the Services, value added (annual % growth) statistic is a key indicator of the health and performance of the services sector within a country, influencing its overall economic development and prosperity.
Top 10 Countries by Services, value added (annual % growth)
Bottom 10 Countries by Services, value added (annual % growth)
Regions
Europe
Analysis of the Services, value added (annual % growth) statistic reveals a varied landscape of economic performance among the listed countries. Countries like Ireland and Estonia show positive growth, indicating robust service sectors. Conversely, countries such as Montenegro and Spain experience significant contractions, highlighting economic challenges. Advantages for high-growth countries include increased employment and investment opportunities. However, disadvantages may include inflationary pressures. For countries with negative growth, the impact may be decreased employment and government revenue. Overall, this statistic is crucial as it reflects the diversification and competitiveness of economies, influencing long-term development prospects and economic stability for each country.
Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia
The data shows the annual percentage growth in value added in services for selected countries. Vietnam leads with 2.01% growth, while the Philippines experiences the largest decline at -9.13%. Countries like Brunei, Laos, and Myanmar also show negative growth rates, indicating potential challenges in their service sectors. Advantages for Vietnam and China include a growing services industry that could boost overall economic performance. Disadvantages for the Philippines and Indonesia include a shrinking service sector that may hinder economic growth. This statistic is crucial as a thriving service industry can drive innovation, employment, and overall economic diversification, ultimately influencing the long-term development trajectory of each country.
ASEAN
Latin America
Annual % growth in value added in services is showing significant variations among the listed countries, with Argentina experiencing a notable decline of -10.56% while Guatemala only decreased by -2.13%. This data indicates a mixed performance in the service sector across Latin America, influencing the economic development of each country differently. Countries like Argentina and Panama facing larger contractions may struggle with economic diversification and job creation, posing challenges for sustainable growth. On the other hand, nations with smaller declines like Guatemala have a relatively resilient service sector, offering stability and potential for future expansion. Each country must address the weaknesses in their service industry to enhance overall economic resilience and competitiveness.
Middle East
The annual % growth in Services, value added for the listed countries ranges from -21.87% in Libya to 3.43% in Egypt. Countries like Lebanon, Armenia, and State of Palestine are experiencing significant contractions in their service sectors, possibly indicating economic challenges. On the other hand, countries like Iran and Egypt show positive growth, portraying a more stable economic environment. The data suggests a varied economic landscape among the countries, with implications for development. Advantages of positive growth include increased economic activity and job creation, while disadvantages of negative growth may involve economic instability and reduced investment. This statistic highlights the importance of the service sector in driving economic development and reflects each country's economic performance and resilience.
Rivals
Anglosphere v BRICS
The annual growth rate for value added in services (% change in constant local currency) varies significantly among the selected countries. The United Kingdom shows the lowest performance with a negative growth rate of -11.90%, followed by India with -8.23%. On the other hand, China exhibits a positive growth rate of 1.95%. This statistic is crucial for assessing the diversification of economies and the level of competitiveness in services sectors. Countries with positive growth rates like China benefit from increased employment opportunities and revenue generation. However, countries experiencing negative growth rates, such as the United Kingdom and India, may face challenges in job creation and economic stability due to a shrinking services sector.
Russia v Ukraine
Both the Russian Federation and Ukraine are experiencing negative growth rates in services value added, with Russia at -2.16% and Ukraine at -1.96%. This indicates a decline in the contribution of the service sector to their respective economies. The Russian Federation, despite a larger economy, may face challenges in diversification away from traditional sectors like energy. On the other hand, Ukraine, with ongoing geopolitical tensions, may struggle to attract investments in services. The impact of this statistic suggests a need for both countries to boost service sector efficiency and innovation to drive economic growth, with Russia focusing on reducing dependency on commodities and Ukraine on improving investment climate and stability.
France v United Kingdom
France has seen a negative annual growth rate of -7.01% in services value added, while the United Kingdom has experienced an even larger decline of -11.90%. This indicates that both countries are facing challenges in their service sectors. For France, the decline may affect its competitiveness and economic growth, potentially leading to job losses and reduced consumer spending. On the other hand, the United Kingdom's larger decline could signal deeper structural issues within its service industry, posing risks to its overall economic stability and attractiveness to investors. These negative growth rates highlight the need for targeted policy interventions to boost the performance of the service sectors in both countries.
Israel v Iran
Iran's Services value added has shown a growth rate of 2.25%, indicating a positive trend in the sector. In contrast, Israel has experienced a decline of -1.92%, suggesting a contraction in the value added within services. Iran's growth may be advantageous as it signals potential economic expansion and increased productivity in various service industries, contributing to overall economic growth. However, Israel's negative growth poses challenges, possibly indicating a slowdown in service sector activities which could impact economic performance. Enhancing the service sector in Iran could lead to further economic diversification and job creation, while Israel may need to address factors hindering service sector growth to maintain competitiveness and sustainable development.
Saudi Arabia v Iran
Iran experienced a positive annual growth rate of 2.25% in services value added, indicating a growing and diversifying service sector. In contrast, Saudi Arabia had a negative growth rate of -2.88%, suggesting a contraction or stagnation in its service industry. Iran's advantage lies in its potential for increased economic diversification and job creation, while Saudi Arabia may face challenges in service sector development, potentially impacting employment opportunities and economic growth diversification. This statistic highlights the differing economic trajectories of the two countries, with Iran poised for service sector expansion and Saudi Arabia potentially needing to focus on revitalizing its service industry to drive future economic development.
India v Pakistan
India experienced a significant decline in Services value added by -8.23%, while Pakistan faced a lesser decline of -1.21%. India's negative growth reflects challenges in its services sector, possibly due to economic slowdown or structural issues. On the contrary, Pakistan's mild decrease indicates relatively better performance but still a slowdown. India's disadvantage lies in the magnitude of the decline, impacting its economic growth and potential job creation. Pakistan's disadvantage is the negative growth, hindering sectoral development. This statistic suggests a need for India to address underlying issues promptly to avoid prolonged economic repercussions, while Pakistan should focus on sustaining growth to enhance its services sector contribution to the economy.
Turkey v Greece
In 2019, Greece experienced a significant decline in its services sector with a negative growth rate of -11.33%. In contrast, Turkey saw a modest growth rate of 1.11% in the same sector. This divergence reflects Greece's ongoing economic challenges, including high public debt and structural issues, impacting its service industry negatively. On the other hand, Turkey's stable growth indicates a more resilient services sector, contributing positively to its economy. However, Turkey faces risks from geopolitical tensions and currency volatility. For Greece, the decline suggests a need for economic reforms to boost the services industry and overall economic development, while Turkey can capitalize on its growth by further investing in service-related sectors to drive sustainable growth.
China v Japan
China, People's Republic of, shows a positive annual growth rate of 1.95% in Services, value added, indicating a steady expansion in the service sector. In contrast, Japan has a negative growth rate of -4.61%, suggesting a decline in value added in services. China's growth reflects its transition towards a more service-oriented economy, diversifying beyond manufacturing. This shift can bring increased employment opportunities and higher incomes. However, it may also lead to challenges such as income inequality and environmental concerns. For Japan, the contraction in services could signal economic stagnation or a shift towards other sectors. This statistic underscores the importance of service sector development for both countries' economic progress and structural transformation.
FAQs
- Which country has the most Services, value added (annual % growth)?
Eswatini has the highest Services, value added (annual % growth) with a rate of 5.41%. - Which country has the least Services, value added (annual % growth)?
Maldives has the lowest Services, value added (annual % growth) with a rate of -31.70%. - What is the average Services, value added (annual % growth) among the listed countries?
The average Services, value added (annual % growth) among the listed countries is -5.19%. - What does Services, value added (annual % growth) statistic signify?
Services, value added (annual % growth) indicates the annual growth rate for value added in services based on constant local currency. It reflects the performance and expansion of various service sectors within a country. - How are the Services defined in the context of this statistic?
Services include value added in wholesale and retail trade, transport, government, financial, professional services, personal services such as education and health care, as well as imputed bank service charges and import duties.