Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)



Countries By Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)



Key points



Official Definition of Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.



Importance

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita is a vital macroeconomic statistic that holds significant implications for a country's development and sustainability. A low value of this statistic indicates that the country may be facing water scarcity issues, which can impact agriculture, industry, and overall economic growth. Water scarcity can lead to decreased agricultural productivity, increased competition for water resources, and potential conflicts over water usage.

On the other hand, a high value of renewable internal freshwater resources per capita signifies that the country has ample water resources available for its population. This can support agricultural expansion, industrial development, and overall economic prosperity. Countries with abundant freshwater resources are better positioned to ensure food security, attract investment, and support a growing population.

In conclusion, the level of renewable internal freshwater resources per capita is crucial for a country's economic development, environmental sustainability, and social stability.



Top 10 Countries by Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)

Bottom 10 Countries by Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)



Regions

Europe

The data on renewable internal freshwater resources per capita varies significantly among the listed countries. For instance, Iceland has an exceptionally high value of 463,894 cubic meters, while Hungary has one of the lowest at 615 cubic meters. Countries like Norway, Finland, and Sweden also boast high values, indicating abundant freshwater resources per person. This statistic is crucial for a country's development as sufficient freshwater resources are vital for agriculture, industry, and overall economic growth. However, countries with lower values may face challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations and industries, potentially hampering their development and necessitating efficient water management strategies.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita vary significantly among the selected countries. Papua New Guinea stands out with a remarkably high value of 82156.88 cubic meters, indicating abundant water resources, while Singapore has the lowest value at 105.53 cubic meters, highlighting water scarcity. Countries like Australia, Brunei, and Laos also boast high values, signifying ample freshwater availability. This statistic plays a crucial role in agricultural productivity, industrial development, and overall sustainability. While countries with high values may have an advantage in agriculture and economic activities reliant on water, those with lower values, like Singapore, must focus on efficient water management and conservation to mitigate potential developmental constraints.

ASEAN

The renewable internal freshwater resources per capita statistic reveals significant disparities among the listed countries. Laos stands out with the highest value, indicating abundant water resources per person, while Singapore has the lowest value, reflecting its limited freshwater availability. Countries like Brunei, Malaysia, and Myanmar also enjoy relatively high values, suggesting greater water security compared to Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. While countries with ample freshwater resources may have an advantage in agriculture and industry development, those with lower resources may face challenges in managing water scarcity, potentially impacting sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and overall economic growth.

Latin America

The statistic on Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita paints a varied picture among the listed countries. Peru stands out with the highest value, boasting 49,272 cubic meters per capita, while Cuba has the lowest at 3,373 cubic meters. The data reveals disparities, with some countries like Chile and Uruguay having abundant freshwater per capita, offering advantages for agriculture and industrial activities. However, countries like the Dominican Republic and El Salvador with lower values may face challenges in meeting water demands for their populations. This statistic underscores the importance of efficient water management for sustainable development, with implications ranging from agricultural productivity to environmental conservation across these nations.

Middle East

The renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in these countries vary significantly, with Georgia having the highest at 15,614.94 cubic meters and Bahrain the lowest at 2.71 cubic meters. Countries like Armenia, Lebanon, and Morocco also have relatively high values, indicating better availability of freshwater resources per person. This statistic is crucial for agriculture, industrial development, and overall sustainability. While countries with high values have an advantage in terms of water security and agricultural production, those with lower values like Bahrain and Qatar may face challenges in meeting water demands for various sectors. Managing and conserving these resources will be pivotal for sustainable development and economic stability in these nations.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita vary significantly among the listed countries. Canada stands out with the highest value of 74,985 cubic meters, followed by New Zealand at 64,241 cubic meters, and Russia at 29,929 cubic meters. These countries benefit from abundant internal water resources, providing advantages such as strong agricultural output and hydropower generation. Conversely, countries like India and South Africa with lower values face challenges such as water scarcity impacting agriculture and industrial activities. This statistic plays a crucial role in sustainable development, influencing economic sectors like agriculture, energy, and overall environmental resilience differently for each country.

Russia v Ukraine

In terms of renewable internal freshwater resources per capita, the Russian Federation leads with 29,929.24 cubic meters, vastly surpassing Ukraine's 1,248.53 cubic meters. This stark contrast presents the Russian Federation with a significant advantage in water availability for its population compared to Ukraine. The ample freshwater availability in Russia supports agricultural production, industrial activities, and ensures water security. On the other hand, Ukraine may face challenges in sustaining agricultural needs and ensuring adequate water supply for its population. For Russia, this statistic contributes positively to economic development and geopolitical strength, while for Ukraine, it poses a potential vulnerability that requires efficient water management strategies.

France v United Kingdom

France has a significantly higher renewable internal freshwater resource per capita compared to the United Kingdom, with 2959.84 cubic meters in France as opposed to 2161.56 cubic meters in the UK. This indicates that France has a greater availability of internal renewable water resources on a per capita basis than the UK. The advantage for France is better resilience to water scarcity issues, potentially leading to more sustainable agricultural practices and a lesser dependency on external water sources. However, this abundance may also result in less urgency to implement stringent water conservation measures. In contrast, the UK's lower per capita renewable water resources could pose challenges in ensuring water security for its population and agricultural sector, requiring the country to focus on efficient water management strategies. The statistic underscores the importance of water resource management in both countries and can significantly impact their agricultural productivity, economic development, and overall sustainability.

Israel v Iran

Iran has a significantly higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita compared to Israel, with 1472.1 cubic meters per capita in contrast to Israel's 81.4 cubic meters. This stark disparity places Iran in a more advantageous position in terms of water availability for its population compared to Israel. However, Iran may face challenges in efficiently managing and distributing its freshwater resources due to its larger population size. On the other hand, Israel's lower freshwater availability per capita may necessitate more stringent water conservation measures and technological innovations for sustainable water management. This statistic plays a crucial role in both countries' development as access to freshwater resources is vital for agriculture, industrial growth, and overall societal well-being.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran has a significantly higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita compared to Saudi Arabia, with 1472.1 cubic meters compared to 66.7 cubic meters, respectively. This reflects Iran's more abundant internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall per person. Iran has an advantage in terms of water security and agricultural development potential due to this higher statistic. However, Saudi Arabia faces a disadvantage as it has limited renewable internal freshwater resources, which could impact its agricultural productivity and sustainability in the long run. This statistic highlights the importance of efficient water management strategies for both countries, with Iran having a more favorable position for sustainable development in this aspect.

India v Pakistan

India has a considerably higher renewable internal freshwater resources per capita at 1035.53 cubic meters compared to Pakistan's 242.08 cubic meters. This indicates that India has a larger availability of internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall per person. The advantage for India is a more secure water supply for its population, agriculture, and industries. However, this abundance could also lead to potential wastage if not managed efficiently. In contrast, Pakistan's lower value signifies a potential strain on water resources, requiring the country to focus on sustainable water management practices to ensure availability for its population. The statistic highlights the importance of water resource management in both countries' development, with India having a relative advantage in this aspect over Pakistan.

Turkey v Greece

Greece has a significantly higher Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita compared to Turkey, with 5421.27 cubic meters in Greece versus 2722.32 cubic meters in Turkey. This indicates that Greece has a more abundant internal renewable water supply per person than Turkey, potentially giving Greece an advantage in ensuring water security and supporting agricultural activities. However, Turkey's lower figure may signal a greater strain on its water resources, impacting sectors like agriculture and industry. The availability of freshwater resources per capita can influence economic development, agriculture productivity, and environmental sustainability in both countries, with Greece having a comparative advantage in this aspect over Turkey.

China v Japan

China, People's Republic of, has a renewable internal freshwater resource per capita of 1993.41 cubic meters, while Japan's value stands at 3405.64 cubic meters. Japan's significantly higher value indicates a more abundant internal freshwater resource availability compared to China. For China, this may pose challenges in ensuring sustainable water supply for its large population and extensive agricultural needs. However, China's lower value could also reflect a higher level of utilization and development of its freshwater resources for economic activities. In contrast, Japan's ample internal freshwater availability presents an advantage in terms of water security and supporting various sectors like agriculture and industry, contributing to its overall development.



FAQs