Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)



Countries By Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)



Key points



Official Definition of Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)

Total population between the ages 15 to 64 as a percentage of the total population. Population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship.



Importance

The statistic "Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)" is crucial for a country as it indicates the proportion of the working-age population within the total population. A higher percentage implies a larger working-age population, potentially leading to economic growth, increased productivity, and a larger tax base to support social services and infrastructure development.

Conversely, a low value of this statistic may indicate an aging population, which could pose challenges such as a shrinking workforce, increased dependency ratio, and greater pressure on pensions and healthcare systems. This could potentially lead to economic strains, decreased productivity, and difficulties in sustaining social welfare programs.



Top 10 Countries by Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)

Bottom 10 Countries by Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)



Regions

Europe

The statistic "Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)" provides insight into the demographic composition of the listed countries. Countries like Andorra, Luxembourg, and Ukraine have a higher percentage of working-age population, indicating a potentially strong labor force for economic productivity. However, this can also lead to higher dependency ratios in the future. On the other hand, countries like Finland and Sweden have a lower percentage, suggesting potential issues with an aging population and workforce in the long term. This demographic composition can impact a country's economic development by influencing workforce availability, pension systems, and overall productivity levels.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand have relatively high percentages of their population aged 15-64, indicating a potentially productive workforce. Brunei and South Korea also have a high percentage, suggesting a strong labor force for economic growth. However, Japan and the Philippines have lower percentages, which may signify aging populations and potential labor shortages. This can impact economic productivity and strain social welfare systems. Countries with a higher percentage may have a demographic advantage in terms of workforce contribution, while those with lower percentages may need to focus on strategies for skill development and labor force participation to sustain economic growth.

ASEAN

Population ages 15-64 (% of total population) shows the working-age population as a proportion of the total population for the listed countries. Singapore stands out with 74.69%, indicating a strong labor force and potential for economic growth. Brunei follows closely at 71.89%, suggesting a similar advantage. Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand fall within the range of 67% to 70%, indicating stable demographic structures for economic productivity. Cambodia, Laos, and the Philippines have lower percentages, signifying potential challenges in sustaining economic growth due to a smaller working-age population. Understanding this statistic is crucial for workforce planning, economic development strategies, and social welfare programs in each country.

Latin America

The statistic on Population ages 15-64 (% of total population) reveals that Brazil has the highest percentage at 69.87%, followed closely by Colombia and Chile. These countries have a relatively large working-age population, which can positively impact economic productivity and growth. However, countries like Guatemala and Bolivia have a lower percentage, indicating a potentially higher dependency ratio. This could strain resources for social welfare and advancement. For each country, the statistic influences labor market dynamics, healthcare needs, and pension systems. While a larger working-age population can drive economic development, countries with a smaller percentage may need to focus on strategies to support their aging population.

Middle East

The statistic "Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)" provides insight into the demographic composition of each country, with values ranging from 57% in State of Palestine to as high as 83% in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Countries like Qatar and the UAE have a higher percentage of working-age individuals, which can positively impact their economic productivity and development. However, this also poses challenges such as potential strain on social services and infrastructure. On the other hand, countries like State of Palestine and Yemen with lower percentages may face issues related to an aging population and a smaller workforce. Overall, this statistic is crucial for understanding the potential labor force dynamics and dependency ratios within each country.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Based on the statistic of Population ages 15-64 (% of total population), we can see that Brazil has the highest percentage at 69.87% followed closely by China at 69.38% and Canada at 66.11%. The United Kingdom has the lowest percentage at 63.49%. A higher percentage indicates a larger working-age population which can positively impact economic productivity and growth. Brazil and China, with their higher percentages, have a potential advantage in terms of a larger labor force for economic development. However, a higher percentage may also indicate a burden on resources such as healthcare and social welfare. The United Kingdom, with a lower percentage, may face challenges in workforce sustainability and economic growth potential. Overall, this statistic is crucial for understanding the demographic balance of a country and its implications for economic development.

Russia v Ukraine

The percentage of population aged between 15-64 years in the Russian Federation stands at 67.01% and in Ukraine at 67.48%. Both countries have a relatively similar demographic structure in terms of the working-age population. This indicates a potential similar labor force composition and dependency ratios. For Russia, having a large working-age population can be advantageous for economic productivity and growth, but it may also pose challenges in terms of providing employment opportunities and social welfare. In contrast, Ukraine may benefit from a more balanced age distribution, potentially leading to a more stable workforce, yet it may also face issues related to an aging population in the future, impacting pension systems and healthcare. Overall, this statistic is crucial for assessing the productive capacity and future development prospects of both countries.

France v United Kingdom

France has 61.44% of its total population aged between 15 to 64, while the United Kingdom has a slightly higher proportion at 63.49%. This statistic indicates that both countries have a significant working-age population, which can potentially drive economic growth and productivity. However, France may benefit from a slightly younger population demographic, allowing for a longer period of workforce contribution. On the other hand, the United Kingdom's slightly higher percentage suggests a potentially more experienced workforce. The development of both countries could be influenced by how effectively they utilize this demographic dividend, with France possibly focusing on skill development for a longer-term impact, and the United Kingdom leveraging the experience within its workforce for immediate gains.

Israel v Iran

In Iran, 68.9% of the total population falls between the ages of 15 to 64, indicating a relatively young and potentially productive demographic. In contrast, Israel has 59.9% within this age range, suggesting a slightly older population structure. Iran may benefit from a larger working-age population for economic productivity, but sustaining this could strain resources for education and employment. Conversely, Israel's older demographic may indicate stability but could pose challenges for pension systems and healthcare. This statistic's implications highlight the potential for economic growth in Iran with a youthful workforce, while Israel may need to focus on policies that cater to an aging population.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

In terms of the "Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)" statistic, Iran has a proportion of 68.90%, while Saudi Arabia has a higher percentage of 71.56%. This data indicates that a significant portion of the total population in both countries falls within the working-age bracket. Saudi Arabia's higher percentage suggests a potentially larger labor force compared to Iran, which can be advantageous for economic productivity. However, Iran's slightly lower percentage may indicate a more stable demographic structure with a higher proportion of dependents. This statistic is crucial for both countries as it influences their workforce dynamics, economic growth, and social welfare policies.

India v Pakistan

India has a higher percentage of population aged 15-64 at 67.22% compared to Pakistan's 58.55%. This indicates a relatively larger working-age population in India, potentially offering a demographic dividend with a strong labor force for economic productivity. However, a larger workforce also poses challenges in terms of skill development, job creation, and providing adequate resources and infrastructure to support this population. In contrast, Pakistan's lower percentage suggests a potentially smaller labor force but may lead to less strain on resources and infrastructure. The impact of this statistic on both countries' development lies in how effectively they can harness their respective demographic structures to drive economic growth and address societal needs.

Turkey v Greece

In Greece, the population aged 15-64 makes up approximately 63.64% of the total population, while in Turkey, this demographic group constitutes around 68.11%. Turkey has a higher percentage of working-age population compared to Greece, indicating a potential advantage for economic productivity and growth. However, this could also lead to challenges such as higher dependency ratios as the population ages. For Greece, a lower percentage may suggest a smaller labor force and potential skills shortages. This statistic is crucial for both countries' development as a larger working-age population can drive economic expansion, while a lower percentage may require strategies to address workforce issues and ensure sustainable growth.

China v Japan

In analyzing the statistic of Population ages 15-64 (% of total population) for China and Japan, we observe that China has a higher percentage at 69.38% compared to Japan's 58.50%. This indicates that a larger proportion of China's total population falls within the working-age bracket, suggesting a potentially larger labor force. For China, this demographic advantage may provide a boost to economic productivity but also pose challenges in providing employment opportunities for such a significant workforce. In contrast, Japan's lower percentage may indicate an aging population, leading to concerns about future labor shortages and increased pressure on social welfare systems. This statistic underscores the importance of workforce planning and social policies in each country's development trajectory.



FAQs