Natural gas rents (% of GDP)



Countries By Natural gas rents (% of GDP)



Key points



Official Definition of Natural gas rents (% of GDP)

Natural gas rents are the difference between the value of natural gas production at regional prices and total costs of production.



Importance



Top 10 Countries by Natural gas rents (% of GDP)

Bottom 10 Countries by Natural gas rents (% of GDP)



Regions

Europe

When analyzing the Natural Gas Rents (% of GDP) statistic for the listed countries, it is evident that Russia and Norway stand out with significantly higher natural gas rent percentages compared to others. Russia's value of 1.12% and Norway's value of 0.91% indicate a heavy reliance on natural gas resources for economic output. This reliance can be advantageous in terms of revenue generation and energy security. However, it also poses risks due to potential market volatility and environmental concerns. On the other hand, countries like Belgium and Moldova have negligible percentages, reflecting a lesser dependence on natural gas rents. While this may indicate economic diversification, it could also mean missed opportunities for revenue. Overall, the impact of this statistic on a country's development lies in balancing the benefits of natural gas exploitation with the challenges it presents, influencing economic stability and strategic positioning in the global energy market.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Analysis of Natural Gas Rents (% of GDP) in Selected Countries:

ASEAN

Among the countries listed, Brunei stands out with the highest share of natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP at 10.24%, indicating a significant reliance on natural gas resources. Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines have lower percentages ranging from 0.12% to 2.16%. Brunei enjoys the advantage of substantial revenue from natural gas, promoting economic growth and development. However, this heavy reliance may also pose risks in the long term if gas prices fluctuate. Countries with lower percentages have more diversified economies, reducing vulnerability to fluctuations in the natural gas market. For these nations, the challenge lies in balancing natural resource exploitation with sustainable development strategies.

Latin America

Argentina, with Natural gas rents at 0.30% of GDP, stands out as a significant player in the region, followed by Bolivia at 1.21%. Brazil, Colombia, and Peru also show notable percentages, indicating a reliance on natural gas resources. While high natural gas rents can boost government revenue and investment, they come with the risk of resource depletion and environmental damage. For Bolivia, the high percentage signifies a strong natural gas sector contributing to the economy but also poses a challenge for diversification. In contrast, Guatemala's minimal natural gas rents reflect limited exploitation of this resource. This statistic underscores the importance of sustainable resource management and economic diversification for long-term growth and stability in these countries.

Middle East

Natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP vary significantly among the selected countries. Qatar ranks highest at 9.63%, followed by Iran at 8.50%, indicating a heavy reliance on natural gas production. These countries benefit from significant revenues, allowing for economic diversification and infrastructure development. However, high dependency on natural gas exposes them to price fluctuations and market instability. On the other hand, Turkey and Georgia have minimal natural gas rents relative to GDP, signifying lesser economic reliance. While they are less vulnerable to market volatility, they may lack the financial influx for large-scale development projects. Overall, the statistic illustrates how natural gas plays a crucial role in shaping economic strategies and vulnerabilities across these nations.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP vary among the selected countries. The Russian Federation leads with 1.12%, followed by Australia (1.21%) and New Zealand (0.23%). Other countries such as China, Brazil, and India have lower percentages ranging from 0.05% to 0.14%. This data indicates that Russia heavily relies on natural gas for economic gains. While high natural gas rents can boost government revenue and industrial growth, it can also lead to over-dependence on a single resource, risking economic instability. For countries like Australia and New Zealand, the advantage lies in diversification, reducing vulnerability to natural gas market fluctuations. In contrast, lower percentages for countries like Brazil and India suggest untapped potential for revenue generation and industrial development. Overall, this statistic underscores the importance of balancing natural resource exploitation for sustained economic growth and stability in each country.

Russia v Ukraine

Natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP show that the Russian Federation derives 1.12% of its GDP from natural gas production, while Ukraine's figure stands at 0.33%. Russia, being a major global natural gas producer, benefits from significant revenues, providing a strong economic base but also a heavy reliance on this volatile commodity. For Ukraine, the lower percentage signifies a smaller but still notable contribution to GDP, offering some stability but potentially hindering further economic diversification. The impact of this statistic is crucial for both countries' development: Russia's economy is heavily influenced by natural gas prices, while Ukraine faces challenges in reducing dependency on this sector for sustained growth.

France v United Kingdom

France has a very low percentage of natural gas rents compared to its GDP, standing at 0.00002139. This indicates a minimal reliance on natural gas production for economic gains. In contrast, the United Kingdom's natural gas rents account for 0.04270% of its GDP, reflecting a significant contribution of the natural gas sector to the economy. The advantage for France lies in diversification away from potentially volatile natural gas markets, while the UK benefits from revenue generation. However, France may miss out on potential economic gains, whereas the UK could face challenges if natural gas prices decline. This statistic underscores the importance of energy sector strategies in economic development for both countries.

Israel v Iran

Iran exhibits a significant reliance on natural gas, with natural gas rents accounting for 8.5% of its GDP. This indicates a substantial contribution of the natural gas sector to Iran's economy. In contrast, Israel's natural gas rents represent a much smaller 0.3% of its GDP, reflecting a lesser dependency on this resource. Iran benefits from its substantial natural gas rents by potentially boosting government revenue and supporting economic development. However, this heavy reliance may expose Iran to fluctuations in natural gas prices and market demand. On the other hand, Israel's lower dependency on natural gas may offer more diversification and stability in its economy, although it may miss out on some revenue opportunities for development.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran and Saudi Arabia both derive natural gas rents as a percentage of their GDP, with Iran standing at 8.50% and Saudi Arabia at 1.28%. Iran, with a significantly higher percentage, benefits from a larger contribution of natural gas to its economy compared to Saudi Arabia. This indicates a potentially stronger natural gas sector in Iran. However, a high dependency on natural gas rents can also pose risks such as vulnerability to fluctuations in global gas prices and market demand for gas. For Saudi Arabia, while the percentage is lower, it may indicate a less dominant role of natural gas in its economy, potentially diversifying its income sources. Overall, the statistic highlights the differing reliance on natural gas for economic sustenance between the two countries, emphasizing the need for Iran to ensure economic stability in the face of natural gas market volatility and for Saudi Arabia to balance its energy sector development for long-term sustainability.

India v Pakistan

India and Pakistan have significantly different values for natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP, with India at 0.0675% and Pakistan at 0.7150%. Pakistan's much higher value indicates a larger portion of its GDP is derived from natural gas production compared to India. For Pakistan, this could mean a greater dependency on natural gas revenue, providing a stable income stream but also vulnerability to fluctuations in gas prices. In contrast, India's lower value shows a lesser reliance on natural gas income, which could indicate a more diversified economy with potentially lower exposure to risks in the natural gas market. The impact of this statistic on their development could vary, with Pakistan benefiting from immediate revenue but facing challenges in diversification, while India may have a more stable economic base but potentially miss out on the benefits of a larger natural gas sector.

Turkey v Greece

Greece has a low percentage of Natural gas rents (% of GDP) at 0.00013, indicating a relatively smaller impact from natural gas production on its economy. In contrast, Turkey has a higher percentage at 0.00167, suggesting a more significant contribution of natural gas rents to its GDP. For Greece, this low percentage may mean less revenue generation and potentially missed opportunities for economic growth. However, it also means less reliance on natural gas, reducing vulnerability to fluctuations in gas prices. On the other hand, Turkey's higher percentage signifies a greater economic dependence on natural gas, which can boost GDP but also expose the economy to price volatility and supply disruptions in the natural gas market.

China v Japan

In terms of natural gas rents as a percentage of GDP, China, People's Republic of leads with 0.14%, indicating a significant reliance on natural gas resources for economic gains. In contrast, Japan shows a much lower proportion at 0.005%, highlighting a lesser dependency on natural gas rents. For China, this reliance on natural gas rents can provide a stable source of revenue but may also lead to economic vulnerability if global natural gas prices fluctuate. On the other hand, Japan's lower dependency reduces exposure to price volatility but may limit the potential economic benefits. This statistic underscores China's strategic advantage in natural gas resources but also points to Japan's diversification in energy sources for economic stability.



FAQs