Merchandise imports (current US$)



Countries By Merchandise imports (current US$)



Key points



Official Definition of Merchandise imports (current US$)

Merchandise imports show the c.i.f. value of goods received from the rest of the world valued in current U.S. dollars.



Importance

Merchandise imports (current US$) is a crucial macroeconomic statistic for a country as it represents the total value of goods received from the rest of the world in terms of current U.S. dollars. The value of this statistic being low or high has significant implications for a country's economy:



Top 10 Countries by Merchandise imports (current US$)

Bottom 10 Countries by Merchandise imports (current US$)



Regions

Europe

The merchandise imports data for the listed countries varies greatly, with major economies like the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and the Netherlands having significantly higher values compared to smaller nations such as Andorra, Montenegro, and Iceland. High import values can indicate strong domestic demand and reliance on foreign products, potentially boosting economic growth but also increasing vulnerability to global market fluctuations. Conversely, lower import values may suggest self-sufficiency but could limit access to diverse goods and technologies. For each country, the level of merchandise imports reflects its trade openness, economic diversification, and resilience to external shocks, shaping their development trajectory and global competitiveness.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

The merchandise imports data for the selected countries range from billions to trillions of current US dollars, with China leading at $2.07 trillion and Korea, Democratic People's Republic (North) at the lowest with $774 million. China, Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam appear as major importers, reflecting their strong industrial bases. Advantages include access to a wide range of goods, potential for economic growth through industrialization; disadvantage may involve trade imbalances leading to debt. High import values signify market demand, infrastructure development, and technology acquisition, aiding in economic expansion but also potentially exposing countries to external economic shocks.

ASEAN

The merchandise imports data for the listed countries varies significantly, with Singapore having the highest value at $329.83 billion and Brunei the lowest at $5.34 billion. Singapore's large imports reflect its role as a major global trading hub while Brunei's lower imports indicate a smaller economy. Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam also show substantial imports, highlighting their strong trade activities. High imports can boost a country's access to goods and technologies but may increase dependence on foreign products. It can drive economic growth through increased consumption but also pose risks if a country relies heavily on imports for essential goods.

Latin America

Merchandise imports, as measured in current US dollars, provide valuable insight into the economic activities of countries. Among the listed countries, Mexico stands out with the highest imports totaling $393.28 billion, showcasing its robust trading relationships and industrial base. Brazil follows closely at $166.34 billion, indicating its strong presence in the global market. However, smaller economies like Cuba and Venezuela have significantly lower import figures, reflecting economic challenges and limited global integration. High imports can signify economic strength but also vulnerability to external shocks, as seen in Argentina's $42.35 billion imports. Overall, understanding merchandise imports is vital for assessing a country's economic development, trade relationships, and resilience to external factors.

Middle East

The merchandise imports data for the selected countries varies significantly, with countries like Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia showing high values, indicating strong import activity. These countries, with their large economies, benefit from access to a wide range of goods from the global market, driving economic growth. However, heavy reliance on imports can also pose risks in terms of trade imbalances and vulnerability to external shocks. Smaller economies like Armenia and Yemen have much lower import values, reflecting their limited purchasing power and potentially slower economic development. For these countries, controlling import costs can be a challenge, impacting domestic consumption and infrastructure development.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Merchandise imports data reveals varying economic strengths and challenges among the listed countries. The United States and China lead significantly in import values, reflecting their economic prowess and global trade dominance. Canada and Brazil also demonstrate substantial import figures, indicating their reliance on international trade. However, high import values could signal trade imbalances and dependency on external goods, posing risks during economic downturns. Conversely, countries with lower imports like New Zealand and South Africa may enjoy more self-sufficiency but could miss out on economic opportunities from global trade. Overall, high import values can drive economic growth through access to diverse goods, but careful management is crucial to ensure sustainable development and mitigate trade risks.

Russia v Ukraine

Merchandise imports data reveals that the Russian Federation imported goods valued at $240.088 billion, significantly higher than Ukraine's imports of $54.337 billion. While Russia's large imports indicate a robust domestic consumption and industrial base, it also highlights their dependency on foreign goods and vulnerability to global market fluctuations. Ukraine, with lower imports, may have a more self-sufficient economy but could be limited in accessing diverse products and technologies. The impact of this statistic on the countries' development lies in their trade dynamics and economic diversification efforts. For Russia, it signifies integration into global markets but also fragility to external disruptions, while for Ukraine, it denotes potential resilience but possible constraints on growth and innovation.

France v United Kingdom

France reported merchandise imports totaling $581.3 billion, while the United Kingdom recorded imports of $638.3 billion. The United Kingdom surpasses France in this statistic, indicating higher value of goods received. For the UK, this signifies a strong demand for foreign products, potentially boosting consumer choices and industrial competitiveness. However, heavy reliance on imports may lead to trade imbalances and currency fluctuations, impacting economic stability. France, although importing less, may have a more balanced trade profile, fostering domestic production and reducing dependency on external goods, thereby promoting self-sufficiency and resilience in the face of global economic fluctuations.

Israel v Iran

Merchandise imports for Iran amount to $38.75 billion and for Israel stand at $69.26 billion. Israel's higher import value suggests a more diversified economy with greater international trade connections compared to Iran. Israel benefits from access to a wide range of goods, supporting its economic growth but also making it more vulnerable to global market fluctuations. On the other hand, Iran's lower imports indicate a more closed economy, potentially limiting its exposure to external risks but also hindering its access to diverse products. This statistic reflects each country's trade dynamics, with Israel likely experiencing more economic stability from its trade activities, while Iran may face challenges in diversification and economic resilience.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran's merchandise imports amount to $38.75 billion, while Saudi Arabia's merchandise imports total $137.99 billion. Saudi Arabia's significantly higher imports indicate a larger reliance on foreign goods compared to Iran. The advantage for Saudi Arabia is access to a wider variety of products for domestic consumption and investment, but this reliance may also pose a risk to its domestic industries. On the other hand, Iran's lower imports suggest a more self-sufficient economy but could also indicate limited access to certain goods or technologies. This statistic impacts both countries' development by influencing trade balances, industrial growth, and economic stability, with Saudi Arabia potentially facing greater vulnerability to external market fluctuations compared to Iran.

India v Pakistan

India's merchandise imports amount to $373.2 billion, signifying a robust inflow of goods into the country. In comparison, Pakistan's merchandise imports stand at $45.8 billion, considerably lower than India's. India's larger imports indicate a more diverse economy with higher consumption levels and stronger international trade connections, offering a wider range of goods to its population. However, this reliance on imports may expose India to external shocks and currency fluctuations. In contrast, Pakistan's lower imports signify a smaller, more focused economy, potentially indicating a need for increased domestic production and self-sustainability. The impact of this statistic on India suggests a developed and consumer-driven economy with opportunities for growth but vulnerable to global market shifts, while for Pakistan, it signifies a more insular economy with potential for increased self-reliance yet limited international exposure.

Turkey v Greece

Greece reported merchandise imports totaling $55.947 billion, while Turkey recorded merchandise imports of $219.517 billion. Turkey's significantly higher import value compared to Greece indicates a larger volume of goods received from the rest of the world, highlighting its greater integration into the global market. This can be advantageous for Turkey in terms of access to a wide range of products and technologies; however, it also poses a risk in terms of dependency on imports. Greece's lower import value may signify a more self-sufficient economy, potentially offering more stability in times of global economic fluctuations. The impact of merchandise imports on development varies; while high imports can fuel economic growth, they also increase trade deficits and vulnerability to external shocks.

China v Japan

China, People's Republic of, recorded a substantial merchandise imports value of $2,065,964,000,000, indicating a high level of trade activity. In contrast, Japan's merchandise imports amounted to $635,460,000,000, reflecting a lower but still significant trade volume. China's large imports suggest a robust domestic demand and manufacturing sector, but it also implies dependence on foreign goods. On the other hand, Japan's imports show a more balanced trade approach. For China, this statistic indicates economic strength but highlights vulnerability to global market fluctuations. For Japan, it signifies a stable trade position with room for growth in diversification.



FAQs