International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)

Countries By International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)

Key points

Official Definition of International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)

International tourism expenditures for passenger transport items are expenditures of international outbound visitors in other countries for all services provided during international transportation by nonresident carriers. Also included are passenger services performed within an economy by nonresident carriers. Excluded are passenger services provided to nonresidents by resident carriers within the resident economies; these are included in travel items. In addition to the services covered by passenger fares--including fares that are a part of package tours but excluding cruise fares, which are included in travel--passenger services include such items as charges for excess baggage, vehicles, or other personal accompanying effects and expenditures for food, drink, or other items for which passengers make expenditures while on board carriers. Data are in current U.S. dollars.

Importance

International tourism expenditures for passenger transport items are crucial for a country's economy as they represent the amount spent by international outbound visitors on transportation services provided by nonresident carriers. A high value of this statistic indicates a higher level of spending by international tourists on transportation within the country, contributing significantly to the country's GDP and supporting employment in the tourism and transportation sectors. It also signifies a country's attractiveness as a tourism destination.

Conversely, a low value of this statistic may imply that the country is not a preferred destination for international tourists, which could be due to factors such as high transportation costs, lack of infrastructure, limited tourism appeal, or safety concerns. This can result in a loss of potential revenue for the country, a decline in the tourism industry, and a negative impact on economic growth.

Top 10 Countries by International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)

Bottom 10 Countries by International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)

Regions

Europe

The data on international tourism expenditures for passenger transport items across the listed countries vary significantly, with France leading at $3.435 billion and Montenegro at the lowest with $8 million. France's high expenditure reflects its status as a top tourist destination, contributing to its robust tourism industry but possibly straining transportation infrastructure. Meanwhile, Montenegro's lower figure indicates room for growth in attracting more international visitors. For countries like Italy and Switzerland, substantial expenditures signify strong tourism sectors that greatly benefit their economies. Conversely, Bosnia and Herzegovina's expenditure of $51 million suggests potential for further development in its tourism industry. Overall, the statistic underscores the importance of tourism for economic growth and highlights varying levels of development and potential across the countries.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

International tourism expenditures for passenger transport items reveal varying levels of engagement in the global tourism market among the listed countries. Notably, Japan and Australia stand out with the highest expenditures, indicating well-developed tourism industries and strong international connectivity. South Korea, Thailand, and Malaysia also demonstrate substantial spending in this category, reflecting robust tourism sectors. Conversely, Laos and Cambodia show lower figures, suggesting potential for further growth and development in their tourism infrastructure. While high expenditures can boost economic growth through job creation and infrastructure development, over-reliance on tourism may pose risks, such as environmental degradation and economic vulnerability to global tourism fluctuations.

ASEAN

The data shows that Thailand has the highest international tourism expenditures for passenger transport items at $816,000,000, followed by Malaysia at $386,000,000 and the Philippines at $304,000,000. Indonesia also contributes significantly with $327,000,000, while Cambodia and Laos have comparatively lower expenditures at $44,000,000 and $9,000,000 respectively. Thailand's advantage lies in its well-developed tourism infrastructure, attracting a large number of international visitors. However, this heavy reliance on tourism leaves it vulnerable to external shocks. Malaysia benefits from diverse tourism offerings but faces challenges of environmental sustainability. Indonesia's archipelagic landscape offers both opportunities and logistical difficulties. The Philippines has a strong cultural appeal but struggles with infrastructural limitations. Cambodia and Laos have potential for growth but need to enhance their tourism promotion efforts. The impact of this statistic on these countries' development is substantial as it drives economic growth through foreign exchange earnings and job creation, but also exposes them to risks such as over-reliance on tourism and external market fluctuations.

Latin America

The data on international tourism expenditures for passenger transport items shows a diverse range among the listed Latin American countries. Brazil leads with a substantial amount of $1.1 billion, followed by Mexico with $811 million and Argentina with $400 million. These countries have the advantage of attracting a large number of international visitors, boosting their economies and creating employment opportunities. However, they may face challenges such as over-reliance on tourism, which can be volatile. Smaller economies like El Salvador and Bolivia have lower expenditures, indicating potential for growth in their tourism sectors. Overall, this statistic reflects the importance of tourism for economic development in Latin America, with varying implications for each country's economic stability and growth potential.

Middle East

International tourism expenditures for passenger transport items vary significantly among the listed countries. Qatar stands out with the highest expenditure of $4.8 billion, indicating a strong tourism industry. Turkey follows with $599 million, showcasing its popularity as a tourist destination. On the other hand, the State of Palestine has the lowest expenditure at $9 million, reflecting limited tourism activities. High expenditures like Israel's $371 million can boost economic growth through increased revenue, job creation, and infrastructure development, while low expenditures like in Armenia may signify untapped potential or challenges in attracting tourists. Overall, this statistic underscores the diverse tourism landscapes, economic opportunities, and challenges present in each country.

Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Australia, Brazil, India, Russia, South Africa, and the United States display varying levels of international tourism expenditures for passenger transport. The United States leads significantly with $13.03 billion, followed by India at $3.20 billion, Australia at $1.17 billion, Russia at $1.66 billion, Brazil at $1.10 billion, and South Africa at $666 million. The United States benefits from a strong aviation industry and diverse tourism offerings but faces the challenge of high competition. India has seen growth due to economic development and a rising middle class. Australia's advantage lies in its natural beauty and diverse attractions. Russia has potential for growth but faces infrastructural challenges. Brazil and South Africa need to enhance their tourism infrastructure to compete effectively. This statistic impacts economic development through job creation, foreign exchange earnings, and infrastructure investment, driving growth in the tourism sector of each country.

Russia v Ukraine

In terms of international tourism expenditures for passenger transport items, the Russian Federation spent $1.66 billion, while Ukraine spent $132 million. The Russian Federation's higher expenditure reflects its larger economy and greater international connectivity compared to Ukraine. This statistic indicates that the Russian Federation benefits from stronger transportation infrastructure and higher tourist inflow. On the downside, it could signify a higher outflow of capital. For Ukraine, the lower expenditure suggests potential challenges in attracting international tourists and developing its tourism industry. This could impact Ukraine's economic growth opportunities, as tourism plays a significant role in generating revenue and creating employment.

India v Pakistan

India's international tourism expenditures for passenger transport items amount to $3.2 billion, while Pakistan's stands at $397 million. India's higher expenditure reflects its larger and more diverse tourism industry, offering attractions from historical sites to scenic landscapes. This indicates a more developed tourism sector compared to Pakistan. However, Pakistan's lower expenditure may suggest untapped potential for growth in its tourism industry. For India, the high expenditure signifies a positive impact on economic growth through tourism revenue, infrastructure development, and job creation. In contrast, Pakistan might need to focus on increasing tourism promotion and investment to boost its economy through the development of this sector.

Turkey v Greece

International tourism expenditures for passenger transport items in Greece amounted to $602,000,000, while Turkey recorded $599,000,000 in the same category. Greece, known for its historical sites and beaches, benefits from a strong tourism industry driven by its cultural attractions. However, Greece faces the challenge of seasonality and dependency on tourism. On the other hand, Turkey, with its diverse offerings from historical sites to resorts, showcases resilience in attracting tourists despite occasional geopolitical issues. This statistic reflects the economic importance of tourism for both countries, contributing significantly to GDP, job creation, and foreign exchange earnings, albeit with varying levels of vulnerability to external shocks.

FAQs