Gross domestic savings (current US$)



Countries By Gross domestic savings (current US$)



Key points



Official Definition of Gross domestic savings (current US$)

Gross domestic savings are calculated as GDP less final consumption expenditure (total consumption). Data are in current U.S. dollars.



Importance

Gross domestic savings is a crucial macroeconomic statistic for a country as it reflects the amount of money that domestic residents, businesses, and the government save after deducting total consumption from the GDP.



Top 10 Countries by Gross domestic savings (current US$)

Bottom 10 Countries by Gross domestic savings (current US$)



Regions

Europe

When analyzing the gross domestic savings for the listed countries, we see a wide range in the values, with large economies like Germany and the United Kingdom significantly outpacing smaller economies like Montenegro and Moldova. These savings represent a country's ability to invest in future growth and withstand economic shocks. Countries with higher savings, such as Austria and Switzerland, have an advantage in funding infrastructure and innovation. However, countries with lower savings, like Montenegro and Moldova, may face challenges in funding development projects and responding to economic downturns. Overall, higher gross domestic savings indicate greater economic stability and potential for long-term growth, while lower savings may signal vulnerability to external shocks and limited investment capacity.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

When examining the Gross domestic savings statistic for the selected countries, we observe a wide range of values. Countries like China and Japan exhibit significantly high savings in current US dollars, indicating a strong propensity to save. On the other hand, countries like Cambodia and Mongolia have relatively lower savings, reflecting potential challenges in accumulating capital reserves. High savings can benefit a country by providing funds for investment and economic stability. However, excessive savings may lead to lower domestic consumption and hinder economic growth. Therefore, striking a balance in savings is crucial for sustainable development in each country.

ASEAN

Analysis of Gross domestic savings (current US$) in selected countries:

These disparities in savings among the listed countries showcase varying approaches to economic management. Higher savings may provide a buffer against economic downturns but can stifle immediate consumption and investment. Conversely, lower savings could signify a focus on immediate consumption, potentially limiting future growth opportunities. Finding the right balance is crucial for long-term sustainable development and economic resilience in the face of global uncertainties.

Latin America

Analysis of Gross domestic savings (current US$) in selected countries:

Middle East

Analysis of Gross domestic savings (current US$) in selected countries:

High savings can indicate future investment capacity for infrastructure and economic growth. However, negative savings may signal economic instability and reliance on external financing. The disparity in savings levels among these countries reflects varying economic policies and development trajectories, with implications for long-term sustainability and resilience to economic shocks.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

When analyzing the Gross domestic savings for the selected countries, we see a diverse range of values. China stands out with a significantly higher figure of $6.56 trillion, followed by the United States at $3.68 trillion. These two countries exhibit robust savings potential, reflective of their large economies and high levels of economic activity. On the other hand, countries like India and South Africa have lower savings values, indicating potential challenges in accumulating capital for future investments. Higher savings can provide advantages such as increased investment and economic stability, but countries with lower savings may face difficulties in funding development projects and may be more vulnerable to economic downturns.

Russia v Ukraine

In terms of gross domestic savings, the Russian Federation leads with a substantial amount of 426,023,704,239.384 current U.S. dollars compared to Ukraine's 11,619,687,327.3673. This indicates a significant disparity in savings between the two countries. The advantage for Russia lies in its ability to potentially invest in larger-scale projects or withstand economic shocks better than Ukraine. However, Ukraine's lower savings could signify potential constraints in funding development projects or preparing for unforeseen financial challenges. The impact of this statistic on development implies that Russia may have more financial resilience and flexibility compared to Ukraine, which could affect their respective long-term economic stability and growth prospects.

France v United Kingdom

France reported a gross domestic savings of $581.34 billion, while the United Kingdom had $490.51 billion in gross domestic savings. In comparison, France has a higher level of savings than the United Kingdom, indicating a stronger financial cushion for future investments and economic stability. The advantage for France is that higher savings can support long-term economic growth and provide resilience during economic downturns. However, a potential disadvantage could be lower immediate consumer spending levels. On the other hand, the United Kingdom may benefit from higher consumer spending due to lower savings, but this could pose a risk in the long run if there is insufficient savings for investments and emergencies. This statistic suggests that France leans towards a more conservative economic approach, prioritizing stability, while the United Kingdom may focus more on consumption-driven growth.

Israel v Iran

Iran has a gross domestic savings of approximately $94.21 billion, while Israel's gross domestic savings amount to around $117.79 billion. Israel demonstrates a higher savings rate compared to Iran, likely indicating a more stable economy and better investment opportunities. However, Iran's lower savings could be a result of higher consumption expenditure, possibly indicating a more robust domestic market. The higher savings in Israel may provide greater financial security and flexibility for future investments and economic growth. On the other hand, Iran's focus on consumption could drive immediate economic activity and boost development in the short term, albeit with potentially higher risks in the long run.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran has a gross domestic savings of approximately $94.2 billion, while Saudi Arabia's gross domestic savings amount to around $204 billion. Saudi Arabia's higher savings reflect its larger economy and oil wealth compared to Iran. The advantage for Saudi Arabia lies in its ability to weather economic downturns and invest in diversified industries. However, this reliance on oil can also be a disadvantage due to price fluctuations. On the other hand, Iran's lower savings indicate a need for increased domestic investment and economic diversification to stimulate growth. Overall, a higher gross domestic savings signifies a stronger economic foundation and resilience for development, highlighting the importance of fiscal policies in ensuring long-term stability for both countries.

India v Pakistan

India's gross domestic savings amount to $724.42 billion, reflecting a robust economy with significant savings potential. In contrast, Pakistan's gross domestic savings are significantly lower at $20.12 billion, indicating a need for increased savings mobilization. India's advantage lies in its large domestic market and diversified economy, while Pakistan faces challenges in boosting savings due to economic volatility. Higher gross domestic savings in India can fuel investment and economic growth, leading to further development opportunities. Conversely, Pakistan may need to focus on policies encouraging savings to support long-term economic stability and growth.

Turkey v Greece

In terms of gross domestic savings, Turkey demonstrates a significantly higher figure compared to Greece, with an amount of $203.41 billion as opposed to Greece's $12.66 billion. This stark contrast indicates Turkey's larger capacity for investment and future economic growth when compared to Greece. However, the disadvantage for Turkey lies in potential economic vulnerability due to overreliance on savings rather than on consumption for economic growth. Greece, on the other hand, may face challenges in funding future investments and development projects due to its lower savings. Ultimately, the level of gross domestic savings in each country can greatly impact their long-term economic development and stability.

China v Japan

China, People's Republic of has a gross domestic savings of $6.56 trillion, showcasing a high level of savings in relation to its GDP. In contrast, Japan has significantly lower gross domestic savings at $1.26 trillion. China's high savings indicate a strong propensity to save among its population, which can be advantageous for investment in infrastructure and long-term economic growth. However, this high savings rate may also lead to reduced consumer spending and slower economic activity in the short term. On the other hand, Japan's lower savings could imply higher levels of consumption and potentially greater economic activity, but it may also indicate lower investment levels for future growth. The impact of this statistic on each country's development lies in balancing savings for future investments while ensuring current economic activity and sustainable growth.



FAQs