General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)



Countries By General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)



Key points



Official Definition of General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

General government final consumption expenditure (formerly general government consumption) includes all government current expenditures for purchases of goods and services (including compensation of employees). It also includes most expenditures on national defense and security, but excludes government military expenditures that are part of government capital formation. Data are in constant 2015 prices, expressed in U.S. dollars.



Importance

The statistic of General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) is crucial for a country as it reflects the amount spent by the government on goods and services, including national defense and security, in constant 2015 US dollars.
A high value of this statistic indicates that the government is actively investing in the economy through various expenditures, which can stimulate economic growth, create job opportunities, and improve infrastructure. It may also signal strong government support for social welfare programs and public services.
Conversely, a low value of this statistic could imply limited government spending on essential services and infrastructure, potentially hindering economic development, social welfare, and overall public well-being. It might also indicate budget constraints or a lack of government intervention in stimulating economic activity.



Top 10 Countries by General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)

Bottom 10 Countries by General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)



Regions

Europe

The data on general government final consumption expenditure in the selected countries ranges widely, from as low as $837 million in Montenegro to as high as $753 billion in Germany. These expenditures reflect each country's priorities and level of government involvement in the economy. Countries like Germany, the United Kingdom, and France, which have high expenditures, may enjoy advantages such as stronger public services but face the disadvantage of potentially higher taxes. On the other hand, countries with lower expenditures like Montenegro may struggle with limited public services but could have lower tax burdens. This statistic impacts a country's development by influencing its infrastructure, social programs, and overall economic stability, shaping its citizens' quality of life and the business environment.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

General government final consumption expenditure reflects the level of government spending on goods and services across countries. Japan leads the group with a substantial expenditure of $934 billion, followed by Korea and Australia. Japan's high spending indicates a strong government role in the economy, which could support stability but also lead to higher taxes. Cambodia and Brunei have relatively lower expenditures, suggesting potential limitations in public services. For developing countries like Vietnam, this statistic underscores the need for increased public investment for growth. Overall, this expenditure impacts infrastructure, education, and social services, influencing each country's development trajectory distinctly.

ASEAN

General government final consumption expenditure data for the selected countries reveals varying levels of government spending on goods and services. Indonesia leads with a substantial expenditure of $94.6 billion, followed by Thailand and the Philippines. Malaysia and Singapore also demonstrate significant spending, while Vietnam, Cambodia, and Brunei have comparatively lower figures. High government expenditure can stimulate economic growth but may strain resources; meanwhile, lower spending countries may have limited public services. This statistic reflects each country's development priorities and economic policies, impacting infrastructure, public services, and overall economic stability.

Latin America

The general government final consumption expenditure statistic provides insight into the level of government spending on goods and services across various countries. Among the listed countries, Brazil stands out with the highest expenditure, indicating a strong focus on government consumption. This high expenditure could potentially boost domestic demand and stimulate economic growth but may also lead to fiscal deficits. In contrast, countries like El Salvador and Honduras have notably lower expenditures, which could indicate limited government investment in public services and infrastructure, potentially hindering their development. Overall, this statistic reflects each country's priorities in terms of public spending and highlights the varying approaches to economic development and governance.

Middle East

General government final consumption expenditure data for the listed countries vary significantly, with countries like Turkey and Saudi Arabia having high expenditures compared to countries like Armenia and Georgia. This reflects the differing priorities and capacities of each country in terms of government spending on goods and services. High expenditure countries like Saudi Arabia may have advantages in infrastructure development and public services but could face challenges of sustainability. On the other hand, lower expenditure countries like Armenia may have more fiscal constraints but potentially better fiscal discipline. The impact of this statistic on countries' development includes the provision of public services, defense capabilities, and overall economic stability, influencing each country's socio-economic landscape uniquely.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

The data on General government final consumption expenditure shows significant variations among the selected countries. The United States leads with a substantial amount of $2.87 trillion, followed by the United Kingdom with $559.3 billion. Canada, Brazil, and Australia also spend sizeable amounts, while India, the Russian Federation, and South Africa allocate comparatively lower figures. New Zealand has the smallest expenditure at $41.01 billion. These expenditures reflect each country's priorities, with advantages such as robust public services and infrastructure development, but drawbacks like high government debt or insufficient investment in key sectors. This statistic influences economic growth, social welfare, and government stability differently in each country.

Russia v Ukraine

General government final consumption expenditure in constant 2015 US$ for the Russian Federation stands at $266.31 billion, significantly higher than Ukraine's $15.44 billion. This indicates stark differences in government spending between the two countries, with Russia allocating a substantially larger portion towards government consumption. For Russia, this high expenditure may indicate a strong focus on public services and infrastructure, potentially leading to better social welfare outcomes but also potentially indicating inefficiencies or corruption. On the other hand, Ukraine's lower expenditure could imply challenges in providing adequate public services, potentially hindering its development progress. This statistic highlights the varying priorities and capacities of the governments in these countries and underscores the potential implications for their economic and social development.

France v United Kingdom

France has a general government final consumption expenditure of approximately $582.89 billion, while the United Kingdom's expenditure stands at around $559.30 billion. France's higher spending may indicate a robust public sector driving economic activity and providing services, potentially enhancing social welfare but also possibly leading to higher taxes or debt levels. In contrast, the UK's slightly lower expenditure suggests a more streamlined public sector, which could promote efficiency but may result in limited public services. The impact of this statistic on development varies; France's higher expenditure could fuel economic growth but also strain public finances, whereas the UK's moderate spending may indicate a more conservative fiscal approach with both advantages and disadvantages in terms of service provision and economic stimulus.

Israel v Iran

Iran's general government final consumption expenditure stands at approximately $61.5 billion in constant 2015 US dollars, while Israel's expenditure is around $78.8 billion. Iran's lower expenditure compared to Israel may indicate potential limitations in its government services and infrastructure development, impacting overall public welfare. However, Iran's lower spending could also imply more efficient resource allocation. On the other hand, Israel's higher expenditure suggests a more robust public sector and potentially better public services, but it may also indicate higher government bureaucracy and inefficiencies. Ultimately, this statistic reflects differing government priorities and could influence each country's economic development and social welfare initiatives differently.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran has a general government final consumption expenditure of approximately 61.5 billion constant 2015 US dollars, while Saudi Arabia's expenditure is significantly higher at approximately 183.2 billion constant 2015 US dollars. This indicates that Saudi Arabia allocates a substantially larger portion of its budget towards government consumption compared to Iran. The advantage for Saudi Arabia lies in its ability to potentially provide more public services and invest in national defense at a higher level. However, this heavy reliance on government expenditure could also be a disadvantage if not efficiently managed, leading to wasteful spending. For Iran, the lower expenditure may limit its ability to provide extensive public services but could also signify a more cautious approach to government spending, potentially avoiding fiscal deficits. The impact of this statistic on both countries' development is crucial as it reflects the government's role in influencing economic activity and welfare through public expenditures, shaping their respective developmental paths.

India v Pakistan

India has a significantly higher General government final consumption expenditure compared to Pakistan, with a value of $286.26 billion in constant 2015 US dollars, in contrast to Pakistan's $39.36 billion. This indicates a greater government spending on goods and services, including national defense, by India. The advantage for India lies in the potential for boosting domestic demand and supporting economic growth. However, this high expenditure could also lead to an increased fiscal deficit. For Pakistan, the lower expenditure may limit its capacity for public service delivery and infrastructure development. The data reflects differing priorities in government spending, impacting each country's development trajectory accordingly.

Turkey v Greece

In terms of General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), Greece recorded $40.67 billion while Turkey had a significantly higher expenditure of $154.24 billion. This statistic indicates that Turkey has a much larger government expenditure in purchasing goods and services compared to Greece. The advantage for Greece is a smaller burden on its economy, allowing for potentially better fiscal management. However, this lower expenditure may limit Greece's ability to invest in key sectors. On the other hand, Turkey's higher expenditure signifies a strong emphasis on government services, which could boost economic growth but may also lead to higher fiscal deficits if not managed efficiently.



FAQs