GNI per capita growth (annual %)



Countries By GNI per capita growth (annual %)



Key points



Official Definition of GNI per capita growth (annual %)

Annual percentage growth rate of GNI per capita based on constant local currency. Aggregates are based on constant 2010 U.S. dollars. GNI per capita is gross national income divided by midyear population. GNI (formerly GNP) is the sum of value added by all resident producers plus any product taxes (less subsidies) not included in the valuation of output plus net receipts of primary income (compensation of employees and property income) from abroad.



Importance

The GNI per capita growth (annual %) statistic holds significant importance for a country as it indicates the rate at which the gross national income per person is increasing or decreasing over a specific period. This statistic matters because it reflects the economic well-being and standard of living of the population.

A high value of GNI per capita growth signifies that the average income of individuals is increasing at a healthy rate. This can lead to improved living standards, increased consumer spending, and overall economic prosperity. It also suggests that the country is likely experiencing economic growth, attracting investments, and creating more opportunities for its citizens.

Conversely, a low value of GNI per capita growth indicates stagnant or declining incomes for the population. This can result in challenges such as reduced purchasing power, lower quality of life, and potential social unrest. A persistently low GNI per capita growth rate may signal underlying economic issues such as limited job creation, lack of investment, or inefficient use of resources.



Top 10 Countries by GNI per capita growth (annual %)

Bottom 10 Countries by GNI per capita growth (annual %)



Regions

Europe

The GNI per capita growth statistic reveals diverse economic performances among the listed countries. While countries like Ireland, Lithuania, and Serbia show positive growth, others such as France, Spain, and Montenegro exhibit significant declines. Advantages for countries with positive growth include potential for increased standards of living and investments. However, countries with negative growth face challenges such as decreased purchasing power and potential economic instability. This statistic impacts a country's development by reflecting its economic health and prospects for future growth. Positive growth can attract investors and boost infrastructure, while negative growth may necessitate policy reforms to spur economic recovery.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

Across the listed countries, GNI per capita growth varies significantly. Brunei exhibits the highest growth at 0.24%, followed by Vietnam at 2.79%, and China at 1.47%. On the contrary, the Philippines experiences a substantial decline of -12.89%, while Malaysia and Indonesia also face negative growth rates. Japan and Mongolia are on a downward trend as well. Brunei benefits from its oil wealth, yet faces the challenge of diversification. Vietnam's growth reflects economic reforms, while the Philippines struggles with inequality. These GNI per capita trends indicate varying levels of economic development and pose challenges such as income disparities, resource dependency, and structural adjustments for the countries.

ASEAN

Brunei experienced a positive GNI per capita growth of 0.24%, indicating a stable economic growth rate. Cambodia and Indonesia, on the other hand, showed negative growth of -2.07% and -2.54% respectively, signaling economic contraction. Malaysia and the Philippines faced significant declines of -6.10% and -12.89% respectively. In contrast, Vietnam demonstrated a notable growth rate of 2.79%, showcasing robust economic advancement. Brunei's advantage lies in its steady growth, while Vietnam benefits from significant progress. However, the disadvantages of Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines are the negative growth rates that can hamper development. This statistic's impact is crucial as it signifies the economic health of a country, influencing investment attractiveness and overall standard of living.

Latin America

The GNI per capita growth (annual %) statistic shows the percentage change in gross national income per person in constant 2010 U.S. dollars for each country. Peru has experienced the largest decrease at -11.28%, indicating economic challenges. Countries like Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile also face significant declines. On the other hand, Paraguay and Guatemala have lower negative growth rates, suggesting relatively more stable economic conditions. This statistic is crucial for understanding each country's economic development. Lower growth rates might result in reduced standards of living, while more stable growth rates could signify a stronger economy with potential for investment and development.

Middle East

The GNI per capita growth rate (%), a key macroeconomic indicator, reveals significant trends among the listed countries. Lebanon demonstrates a substantial decline of 20.39%, indicating severe setbacks in economic development. In contrast, Egypt shows positive growth of 2.31%, reflecting potential prosperity. Each country faces unique advantages and disadvantages; for example, Bahrain benefits from strategic geographic positioning but suffers from economic volatility. This statistic profoundly influences a nation's development trajectory, guiding policy decisions and highlighting areas for improvement. It is imperative for policymakers to address the underlying factors driving these trends to foster sustainable economic growth and enhance the wellbeing of their populations.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Among the countries listed, Australia displays a positive growth in GNI per capita at 0.05%, while Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States exhibit negative growth rates, especially noteworthy is the UK's significant decline of 12.22%. Economically, Australia and China show relative resilience compared to the United States and India, which face substantial declines. Advantages for Australia include economic stability, while challenges persist for the UK with Brexit uncertainties impacting its growth. These statistics reflect each country's economic performance, with positive growth indicative of overall development, while negative growth signals potential economic challenges ahead.

Russia v Ukraine

For the Russian Federation, the GNI per capita growth rate is at -1.63%, indicating a decline in the average income level per person over the year. In comparison, Ukraine's GNI per capita growth stands at -2.05%, showing a slightly sharper decrease. The Russian Federation's larger economy may provide more resilience to weather economic downturns compared to Ukraine. However, both countries face challenges such as economic instability and geopolitical tensions which impact their development prospects. The negative growth in GNI per capita suggests a decrease in the standard of living for citizens in both countries, pointing towards potential economic challenges ahead.

France v United Kingdom

The GNI per capita growth for France stands at -8.72% while the United Kingdom is at -12.22%. These figures suggest that both countries experienced a decline in their economic performance based on the GNI per capita indicator. The United Kingdom's larger negative growth rate indicates a more pronounced economic downturn compared to France. For France, a disadvantage lies in the significant contraction of GNI per capita, potentially leading to reduced consumer spending and investment. Conversely, the United Kingdom faces a greater challenge with an even steeper decline, indicating broader economic challenges. This statistic implies a slowdown in economic progress for both countries, necessitating policy interventions to boost growth and stabilize their economies.

Israel v Iran

Iran experienced a positive annual growth rate of 2.30% in GNI per capita, while Israel saw a decline of -2.90% in the same measure. This indicates a divergent economic performance between the two nations. Iran's growth suggests an improving standard of living and potential for increased domestic consumption. However, this growth may also be linked to factors like inflation or changing income distribution. In contrast, Israel's decline could indicate economic challenges or a shift in government policies impacting growth. The statistic highlights the importance of sustainable economic development strategies for both countries, with Iran potentially focusing on inclusive growth and Israel on addressing factors leading to the decline.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran experienced a positive annual GNI per capita growth rate of 2.30%, indicating a modest economic development. In contrast, Saudi Arabia saw a decline of -4.12%, signaling a setback in its economic prosperity. Iran's advantage lies in its relatively stable growth, potentially resulting in improved living standards for its population. However, the country may face challenges in sustaining this growth amidst economic sanctions. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia's disadvantage stems from the negative growth rate, raising concerns about economic instability and impact on its citizens. This statistic reflects the diverging paths of these countries in terms of economic progress, with Iran showing resilience and Saudi Arabia facing obstacles that may hinder its development.

India v Pakistan

India has experienced a significant decline in GNI per capita growth with a rate of -7.12%, indicating economic challenges. In contrast, Pakistan's rate stands at -3.05%, showing a relatively lesser decline in comparison. India's larger economy and diverse sectors provide stability but also expose it to global economic fluctuations. On the other hand, Pakistan faces internal stability concerns but has potential for growth through strategic partnerships. The negative growth rates suggest economic slowdown and potential challenges in development efforts for both countries, urging the need for policy reforms and strategic investments to spur economic growth and improve living standards.

China v Japan

China, People's Republic of experienced a positive growth rate in GNI per capita at 1.47% annually, indicating economic advancement. In contrast, Japan saw a decline of -3.24% in the same metric, suggesting economic challenges. China's increasing GNI per capita reflects its rapid economic growth and substantial population. This growth can lead to improved living standards and increased consumer spending, stimulating further economic development. However, it may also widen income inequality and strain resources. Japan's negative growth rate may signal economic stagnation or recession, impacting consumer confidence and investment. This could hinder innovation and future economic prospects.



FAQs