External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)



Countries By External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)



Key points



Official Definition of External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)

Total external debt is debt owed to nonresidents repayable in currency, goods, or services. Total external debt is the sum of public, publicly guaranteed, and private nonguaranteed long-term debt, use of IMF credit, and short-term debt. Short-term debt includes all debt having an original maturity of one year or less and interest in arrears on long-term debt. Data are in current U.S. dollars.



Importance

Total external debt is a crucial macroeconomic statistic for a country as it reflects the amount of money that a country owes to foreign creditors. The level of external debt can have significant implications for a country's economic stability and development.



Top 10 Countries by External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)

Bottom 10 Countries by External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)



Regions

Europe

When examining the external debt stocks for the selected countries, stark differences become apparent. The Russian Federation holds the largest debt at over $460 billion, while Moldova's debt is the smallest at around $7.9 billion. Such high debt levels can provide access to necessary capital for development but also pose risks in terms of repayment obligations and vulnerability to economic fluctuations. Countries like Belarus and Ukraine also have significant debt burdens, which may limit their fiscal flexibility. In contrast, countries like Bulgaria and Romania, with relatively lower debt levels compared to their GDP, may enjoy more stability and ease in attracting investments. Managing external debt effectively is crucial for sustainable growth and financial stability for these nations.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

External debt stocks can vary significantly among the listed countries. China holds the highest total external debt, amounting to $2.3 trillion, dwarfing the debt of other nations such as Thailand with $197 billion and Cambodia with $17.6 billion. While high external debt can indicate investments and economic growth, it also poses risks of default and vulnerability to external shocks. For China, this debt could indicate its expansive Belt and Road Initiative, opening opportunities for infrastructure development but also raising concerns about debt sustainability. Smaller nations like Laos and Myanmar with lower debt levels may benefit from less financial strain but could face limitations in funding critical projects for their development.

ASEAN

Cambodia holds a total external debt of $17.59 billion, indicating a moderate debt level, which can be advantageous for funding developmental projects but may pose some repayment risks. Indonesia stands out with a significantly higher external debt of $417.18 billion, reflecting its large economy and potential financing challenges. Laos and Myanmar have relatively lower debt levels at $20.50 billion and $13.41 billion respectively, suggesting less financial strain but possibly limited access to capital for growth. The Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam exhibit varying debt levels between $98.49 billion and $197.23 billion, each facing unique advantages such as infrastructure investments or potential financial vulnerabilities. Overall, the management of external debt is crucial for these countries' development as it can enable economic growth through investments but also pose risks if not carefully monitored.

Latin America

Argentina, with an external debt of $255.6 billion, and Brazil, with $549.3 billion, hold the highest debts among the listed countries. Mexico follows closely behind with a debt of $602.7 billion. These countries face the advantage of having access to substantial funds for investment and development but are also burdened with the risk of economic instability due to the large debt amounts. In contrast, Bolivia and Nicaragua have much smaller debts at $15.4 billion and $13.8 billion, respectively, potentially indicating lower financial leverage but also possibly limited access to capital for growth. The level of external debt for each country can significantly impact economic policies, currency stability, and national development strategies.

Middle East

Looking at the total external debt stocks for the listed countries, we see a wide range of values, with Turkey having the highest at $429 billion while Syria has the lowest at $4.8 billion. Higher debt levels can provide access to capital for development projects but also come with the risk of repayment challenges and dependence on creditors. For instance, Egypt's substantial debt of $132 billion could indicate potential financial vulnerability. On the other hand, lower debt levels like in Armenia could signify more financial independence. Managing external debt effectively is crucial for economic stability and sustainable development in these countries.



Rivals

Russia v Ukraine

When considering the total external debt stocks for the Russian Federation and Ukraine, a stark contrast is revealed. The Russian Federation shows a significantly higher external debt of $460.93 billion compared to Ukraine's $132.41 billion. This indicates that Russia has a greater reliance on external borrowing which could potentially lead to greater economic vulnerability. While this debt may have been incurred for infrastructure development, it also poses risks in terms of repayment obligations and dependency on foreign creditors. On the other hand, Ukraine's lower debt may indicate a more conservative borrowing approach, reducing immediate financial risks but potentially limiting rapid growth opportunities. Overall, managing external debt is crucial for both countries to ensure sustainable economic development and avoid potential debt crises.

India v Pakistan

India has an external debt stock of $564.98 billion while Pakistan has a total external debt of $118.05 billion. India's higher debt level reflects its larger economy and greater access to international capital markets compared to Pakistan. The advantage for India lies in using the borrowed funds to finance development projects and stimulate economic growth, but the high debt amount also poses a risk in terms of repayment obligations and vulnerability to external economic shocks. On the other hand, Pakistan's lower debt burden may indicate a more conservative approach to borrowing, reducing the immediate risk of default but potentially limiting its ability to invest in infrastructure and other development initiatives. Managing external debt is crucial for both countries to ensure sustainable economic progress and avoid financial crises.



FAQs