Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)



Countries By Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)



Key points



Official Definition of Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)

Adjusted net national income is GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural resources depletion.



Importance

Adjusted net national income (annual % growth) is a crucial macroeconomic statistic for a country as it reflects the true economic performance and sustainability over time.



Top 10 Countries by Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)

Bottom 10 Countries by Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)



Regions

Europe

Adjusted net national income growth rates for the listed countries vary significantly, ranging from a high of 4.31% in Luxembourg to a low of -14.92% in Montenegro. Countries like Ireland, Serbia, and Ukraine show positive growth rates, indicating economic expansion, while countries like Montenegro, Spain, and Greece exhibit substantial contractions, suggesting economic challenges. Advantages of higher growth rates include increased prosperity, improved living standards, and potential for investment. However, disadvantages of negative growth rates include economic instability, reduced investor confidence, and potential for recession. This statistic influences a country's development by reflecting its economic health, guiding policymakers in formulating appropriate strategies, and impacting investor perceptions and market dynamics.

Far East: East Asia, SE Asia, Australia

The Adjusted net national income (annual % growth) statistic shows significant variation among the listed countries. Brunei and the Philippines have negative growth rates, indicating economic contraction, with the Philippines experiencing the largest decline at -11.14%. Vietnam stands out with strong growth of 4.07%, signaling economic expansion. Japan has a substantial decline at -5.37%, while China maintains a modest growth rate of 0.23%. These statistics reflect each country's economic health, with advantages such as potential for investment in growing economies like Vietnam and China, but also disadvantages like economic downturns in Brunei and the Philippines. This statistic impacts each country's development by influencing investment decisions, policy formulation, and overall economic stability.

ASEAN

Adjusted net national income growth in these countries varies significantly, with Brunei experiencing a significant decline of -7.51% and Vietnam showing a positive growth of 4.07%. Brunei's decline may indicate challenges in managing resources sustainably, while Vietnam's growth suggests effective utilization of resources for economic development. Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines also show negative growth rates, highlighting potential issues in resource management and economic efficiency. This statistic reflects each country's economic resilience and sustainability efforts, influencing their development trajectory and highlighting the need for strategic resource management to ensure long-term prosperity.

Latin America

Adjusted net national income growth has varied among the listed countries, with some experiencing negative growth rates such as the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and Chile, while others like Paraguay and Bolivia have shown marginal positive growth. Countries like Uruguay and Argentina fall in between, showing moderate declines. This statistic reflects the economic health and sustainability of each country, with implications for development strategies. For instance, countries with negative growth may face challenges in maintaining their economic output and investing in infrastructure, while those with positive growth have opportunities for increased investment and development. Each country must carefully evaluate the implications of their adjusted net national income growth to create effective economic policies.

Middle East

The adjusted net national income growth rate for the selected countries varies significantly, with Lebanon experiencing the largest decline at -25.59%, followed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia at -12.18% and -11.98% respectively. Egypt, Iran, and Israel show positive growth rates, indicating economic progress. Lebanon's considerable decline reflects economic challenges, while positive rates suggest growth opportunities. Advantages of positive growth include improved standard of living and investment potential, but may also lead to inflation. Disadvantages of negative growth include economic instability and reduced investor confidence. This statistic impacts development by influencing government spending, investment decisions, and overall economic stability differently in each country.



Rivals

Anglosphere v BRICS

Adjusted net national income (annual % growth) provides insights into a country's economic performance after accounting for capital consumption and natural resource depletion. Canada, India, South Africa, and the United States exhibit negative growth rates, indicating economic challenges such as reduced productivity and sustainability concerns. On the other hand, China and New Zealand show slight positive growth, suggesting more stable economic conditions. Brazil and the Russian Federation also face negative growth, potentially indicating economic instability. While negative growth can signal economic vulnerabilities, positive growth reflects stability and potential for growth in the long term, impacting development trajectories and policy decisions in each country accordingly.

Russia v Ukraine

In terms of Adjusted net national income (annual % growth), the Russian Federation experienced a negative growth rate of -3.23%, indicating a decline in its income after accounting for capital consumption and resource depletion. Conversely, Ukraine saw a positive growth of 1.26%, suggesting an improvement in its adjusted national income. The Russian Federation's disadvantage lies in its contracting income, potentially signaling economic challenges or resource mismanagement. On the other hand, Ukraine benefits from its growth, indicating a more sustainable economic trajectory. This statistic impacts their development by influencing investment attractiveness and resource management policies, with Russia facing potential economic headwinds and Ukraine showing signs of progress and stability.

Israel v Iran

Iran experienced a 5.72% growth in Adjusted net national income, showcasing a positive economic trajectory. Meanwhile, Israel's Adjusted net national income declined by -2.46%, indicating economic contraction. Iran's growth suggests a robust economy with increasing national income after accounting for capital and resource consumption. However, this growth could be unsustainable if not managed properly, leading to overexploitation of resources. In contrast, Israel's decrease raises concerns about economic stability and potential obstacles to growth. This statistic reflects Iran's potential for economic expansion but also highlights the need for sustainable resource management. For Israel, it signifies challenges that may require structural adjustments for long-term prosperity.

Saudi Arabia v Iran

Iran has shown a 5.72% annual growth in Adjusted net national income, indicating a positive trend in economic prosperity. In contrast, Saudi Arabia has experienced a significant decline of -11.98%, suggesting economic challenges. Iran's growth could lead to increased investments in infrastructure and social programs, fostering long-term development. However, there may be risks of inflation or overheating if not managed properly. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia's decline may require austerity measures and diversification of the economy to reduce dependency on oil. This statistic highlights the diverging paths of these countries in economic performance and the need for strategic planning to ensure sustainable growth.

India v Pakistan

India experienced a significant decline in Adjusted Net National Income with a growth rate of -6.91%, indicating a contraction in economic activity. In contrast, Pakistan's Adjusted Net National Income showed a marginal decrease of -0.35%. Despite both countries facing negative growth, India's decline was more severe compared to Pakistan. The advantage for Pakistan lies in its relatively stable economic performance, while India may suffer from reduced economic output and potential implications for investment and development. This statistic suggests a need for India to address economic challenges to avoid prolonged negative impacts on development, whereas Pakistan may need to focus on maintaining its current stability to support long-term growth.

China v Japan

China's Adjusted net national income shows a positive growth rate of 0.23%, indicating a steady increase in its net income after accounting for capital consumption and resource depletion. In contrast, Japan experiences a negative growth rate of -5.37%, highlighting a decline in its adjusted net national income. China's growth reflects its robust economic activities and investments, contributing to its development. However, Japan's negative growth may signal economic challenges such as decreasing productivity or environmental concerns. This statistic suggests China's resilience and potential for further growth, while Japan may need to address underlying issues to sustain its economic health.



FAQs